Your Ad Here
Showing posts with label Marvel. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Marvel. Show all posts

Wednesday, October 19, 2011

Captain America Deleted Scene








Saturday, October 15, 2011

Avengers 1st Trailer



everything looks nice... except for Bruce Banner...  More focus on Iron Man... Cap is the first leader of Avengers?

Marvel.com

Wednesday, August 24, 2011

Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeance





from Marvel.com


Tuesday, August 2, 2011

Thursday, June 30, 2011

Awesome Captain America Trailer



plus new movie poster!


















































Wednesday, March 30, 2011

The First Avenger

Looking good! Enjoy...

Friday, March 18, 2011

The Wolverine Saga

The Marvel Universe has really some casting issues. We’ll be seeing Chris Evans as “Captain America” this year, who originally played Fantastic Four’s “Johnny Storm.” I’m thinking it’s okay if you’re Ryan Reynolds, play Marvel’s “Dead Pool” and then go to DC to play “Green Lantern.” But within the same Marvel Universe, it’s just wrong.


I guess it all started with Hugh Jackman. When I learned he would play the iconic character "Wolverine" who is everybody's favorite, I asked myself... "Isn't Hugh Jackman too tall to be Wolverine?" Selecting Jackman had its perks but to the detriment of “Cyclops” played by James Marsden who looked small standing next to Jackman.


Well... finally, there's someone who knows about comics and surprisingly for me, the director of "Black Swan"... yawn… yawn… yawn… Darren Aronofsky! He was set to direct “The Wolverine” movie but unfortunately, he just quit!






Here’s an excerpt from Yahoo! Movies… What he told Jackman about the Wolverine character.

Aronofsky's sudden departure also raises a big question for Jackman, who recently spoke out about how the Oscar-nominated director ordered him to bulk up for the role.



Just last month Jackman told The Los Angeles Times he was on a 6,000 calorie-a-day diet and weighed 210 lbs.


"I don't know how much I want to give away about it, but Darren said with the last one, 'Hey you looked great, but you're so tall that in those long shots you looked kind of like Clint Eastwood, and that's not Wolverine,''" Jackman said. "He said that Wolverine, in the comics, is powerful, stocky, you know, he's short and thick. So he said, 'I want you to go there, get bigger.'"


Complete article here!



Wednesday, March 9, 2011

X-Men: First Class - Official Trailer

Nice trailer... can't wait to see the movie! :)


Wednesday, September 9, 2009

3D, Marvel, Disney and my wife’s caldereta

Last weekend, I had an interesting mix of entertainment choices, which is somehow relevant to the times. One night, I finally watched “Punisher: War Zone” and the following day “UP” in 3D, the former from Marvel and the latter from Walt Disney/ Pixar. Relevant… since before the weekend, Walt Disney has acquired Marvel. Though the union has been greeted by mostly dissatisfied loyalist of Marvel, I believe good things would emanate from the merger.


Punisher: War Zone

I have a knack for Marvel movies and my favorite aside from Spiderman 2 is Daredevil (they say it flopped but I hope there’s a sequel in the works). And if video games have in-game mini games, in Marvel movies there such a game I call “spot when in the movie will Stan Lee makes his appearance.” Oddly though, I didn’t see Stan in this one… or I missed it? The second Punisher (actually it’s really not the second one based on IMDb.com) movie has been on my list for some time even though the movie did not stir that much fanfare in my part of the world. The movie is definitely war and it is more violent than the first Punisher movie that starred Thomas Jane. I should have not eaten my wife’s “caldereta” for dinner, as blown heads and blood was throughout the movie. To give credit to Ray Stevenson, the new Punisher, he was badass in the movie who can show emotion quite better than Thomas Jane, which in effect humanized the character.


Up (3D)

My wife insisted that we watch the new animated movie from Pixar, Up. I was really not planning to watch it in the big screen but she insisted that we go since it’s in 3D. Hmmm sarcastically I replied, we are going to watch a 3D animated movie in 3D? Used 3D twice in a sentence! Looks like it’s a rip off if you ask me. And one thing more, we’re going to use 3D glasses, which have to be wiped after another person used it… thank you very much! But luckily we have free tickets because of a Citibank card promo, which amounts to 130 pesos so we just add some more to cover for the 300 pesos a pop movie ticket. Cheaper than going to an Imax movie I believe is the consolation. So here we go I said to myself, my first 3D movie experience. Even in no 3D, Up is a delightful movie in the tradition of the way things are done by Pixar. But using 3D technology made it more enjoyable however I was distracted by my curiosity in taking off the 3D glasses at times just to check whether which parts of the movie is in 3D (blurred screen) or not and of course the unscheduled trip to the restroom midway through the movie.

I was impressed with the 3D movie technically and if all movies would be in 3D and if they lower the viewing fee, people might again watch movies in theaters more than in the confines of their homes. However, a technological threat is fast approaching to the dismay of film companies I guess but to the delight of home theater enthusiasts. 3D television, which has been with us since 1983 (prototype by Philips http://news.cnet.com/2300-1041_3-10001486-7.html?tag=mncol) is definitely coming and it’s only a matter of time when people again skip the big screen experience but would surely increase the sales of large LCD TV.



3D TV related links!

http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10345950-1.html

http://news.cnet.com/2300-1041_3-10001508-6.html?tag=mncol

http://news.cnet.com/2300-1041_3-10001506-12.html?tag=mncol

http://news.cnet.com/2300-1041_3-10001508-8.html?tag=mncol

http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10345496-1.html

http://news.cnet.com/8301-17938_105-10344653-1.html